Competitor profile

optimal design and construction

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 17% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 May 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 L
of ₹38.6 L bid — 17.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹38.6 L
17.4%
82.6%
Awarded₹6.7 L17.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹31.9 L82.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
IFTKHAR KHAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
LOHAR MULTANI STEEL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SOURABH ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHAGUN CONSTRUCTION SERVICE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
shubhi construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ABHAY CONSTRUCTION PITHAMPUR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedoptimal design awardedOthers

About optimal design and construction

optimal design and construction appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹6.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against IFTKHAR KHAN, LOHAR MULTANI STEEL and SOURABH ENTERPRISES. IFTKHAR KHAN bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; optimal design and construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.