Competitor profile

M/s Om Shri Saibaba Construction

They win 12% of what they bid — and 31% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

26tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
22 Feb 2016last award
Total bids
25
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.6 Cr
of ₹43.8 Cr bid — 31.0% conversion
Win rate
12.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count25 bids
12.0%
12.0%
76.0%
Awarded312.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected312.0%
Lost1976.0%
By value₹43.8 Cr
31.0%
33.6%
35.3%
Awarded₹13.6 Cr31.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.7 Cr33.6%
Lost₹15.5 Cr35.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-MRRDA₹13.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SURESH.H.CHAKOLE6 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹6.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
m/s P N Dewalkar Cons7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
S.K.Mehta and Co.1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹5.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
shree saibaba construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SETH CONSTRUCTION CO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOm Shri Saibaba awardedOthers

About M/s Om Shri Saibaba Construction

M/s Om Shri Saibaba Construction appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 12.0% win rate — worth ₹13.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Feb 2016.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-MRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SURESH.H.CHAKOLE, SEVEN HILLS MINING AND CONST CO ( I ) PVT. LTD. and m/s P N Dewalkar Cons. SURESH.H.CHAKOLE bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M/s Om Shri Saibaba Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.