Competitor profile

OM SAI NATH CONSTRUCTION

They win 22% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
32
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹7.6 Cr bid — 21.5% conversion
Win rate
21.9%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
21.9%
78.1%
Awarded721.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2578.1%
By value₹7.6 Cr
21.5%
78.5%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr21.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.0 Cr78.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S ABHAY KUMAR AND BROTHERS3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹62.6 L
won head-to-head
02
SINGHAL ENTERPRISES1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
03
MS HARI MOHAN GUPTA2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹47.8 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S V D ASSOCIATES1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S NIRBHAY KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BEHL ENGINEERS AND TRADERS0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM SAI NATH awardedOthers

About OM SAI NATH CONSTRUCTION

OM SAI NATH CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 21.9% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S ABHAY KUMAR AND BROTHERS, SINGHAL ENTERPRISES and MS HARI MOHAN GUPTA. M/S ABHAY KUMAR AND BROTHERS bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; OM SAI NATH CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.