Competitor profile

M/s. OM PROVISIONS

They win 15% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

34tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 May 2026last award
Total bids
34
34 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
29 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.2 L
of ₹7.8 Cr bid — 11.5% conversion
Win rate
14.7%
of 34 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count34 bids
14.7%
85.3%
Awarded514.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2985.3%
By value₹7.8 Cr
11.5%
88.5%
Awarded₹89.2 L11.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.9 Cr88.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS/ BABA BISWANATH CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹35.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 30 shared tenders
₹18.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S PALEI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S M H ZAMAN2 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹35.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s P.K.RAY2 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹18.2 L
won head-to-head
06
NILANCHAL NAHAK3 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹61.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM PROVISIONS awardedOthers

About M/s. OM PROVISIONS

M/s. OM PROVISIONS appears as a bidder on 34 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 34 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 14.7% win rate — worth ₹89.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Aluminium Company Limited,NALCO, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 18.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS/ BABA BISWANATH CONSTRUCTION, M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTION and M/S PALEI CONSTRUCTION. MS/ BABA BISWANATH CONSTRUCTION bid on 31 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s. OM PROVISIONS won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.