Competitor profile

NIWAS GARHWAL-GARHWAL TUBEWELL CO.

They win 31% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
7 May 2013last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.1 Cr
of ₹20.2 Cr bid — 30.3% conversion
Win rate
30.8%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
30.8%
30.8%
38.5%
Awarded430.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected430.8%
Lost538.5%
By value₹20.2 Cr
30.3%
37.2%
32.5%
Awarded₹6.1 Cr30.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.5 Cr37.2%
Lost₹6.6 Cr32.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹6.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAM SINGH PACHAR-m/s pacharandcompany0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Rajendra Singh3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹5.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
HABIB ALI-M/s Sheikh Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNIWAS GARHWAL-GARHWAL awardedOthers

About NIWAS GARHWAL-GARHWAL TUBEWELL CO.

NIWAS GARHWAL-GARHWAL TUBEWELL CO. appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 30.8% win rate — worth ₹6.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 May 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Liyakat Ali-M/S chauhan Construction Company, RAM SINGH PACHAR-m/s pacharandcompany and Rajendra Singh. Liyakat Ali-M/S chauhan Construction Company bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NIWAS GARHWAL-GARHWAL TUBEWELL CO. won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.