Competitor profile

Nishant Rattan

They win 33% of what they bid — and 46% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
4 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 46.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
33.3%
16.7%
50.0%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost350.0%
By value₹3.7 Cr
46.4%
10.9%
42.7%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr46.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.9 L10.9%
Lost₹1.6 Cr42.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARDEEP SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Deep Chand0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Harsh Mehta0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Pushpender Bhargav0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Vikrant Sharma0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Kamal Dev1 win · 1 shared tender
₹37.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNishant Rattan awardedOthers

About Nishant Rattan

Nishant Rattan appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bus Stands Management and Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HARDEEP SINGH, Deep Chand and Harsh Mehta. HARDEEP SINGH bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Nishant Rattan won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.