Competitor profile

NIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
20 Oct 2022last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 L
of ₹5.4 Cr bid — 0.7% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
28.6%
57.1%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost457.1%
By value₹5.4 Cr
41.1%
58.2%
Awarded₹4.0 L0.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr41.1%
Lost₹3.1 Cr58.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹4.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KOOLAQUA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹39.5 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Cooling Solution1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/s Chandesh Kumar Bhagat0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES

About NIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES

NIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹4.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Oct 2022.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 29.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KOOLAQUA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CLAYTON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED and GS COOLING TOWERS AND COMPONENTS PVT. LTD.. KOOLAQUA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; NIRVANA TECHNOLOGIES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.