Competitor profile

NIKHIL JHAMTA

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 17% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
12 May 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹39.2 L
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 17.3% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected360.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.3 Cr
17.3%
82.7%
Awarded₹39.2 L17.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr82.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARDEV SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SUBHASH KUMAR PANTA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
prikshit sharma0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ARUN KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Hari Bhushan1 win · 1 shared tender
₹97.9 L
won head-to-head
06
VINOD AUMTA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNIKHIL JHAMTA awardedOthers

About NIKHIL JHAMTA

NIKHIL JHAMTA appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹39.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Himachal Urban Development Authority, at 90.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HARDEV SINGH, SUBHASH KUMAR PANTA and prikshit sharma. HARDEV SINGH bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NIKHIL JHAMTA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.