Competitor profile

NIHAR RANJAN PATEL

They win 17% of what they bid, and 25% of the value they chase.

70tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
63
70 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
48 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹57.8 Cr
of ₹234.7 Cr bid — 24.6% conversion
Win rate
17.5%
of 63 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count63 bids
17.5%
76.2%
Awarded1117.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected46.3%
Lost4876.2%
By value₹234.7 Cr
24.6%
67.6%
Awarded₹57.8 Cr24.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.1 Cr7.7%
Lost₹158.8 Cr67.6%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹31.4 Cr54.3%
EIC-CIVIL₹24.7 Cr42.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹57.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
tapan kumar sahu3 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹11.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
JISHU KRISHNA PATRA1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SANJIT KUMAR NAIK1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S SUMEET & ASSOCIATES1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹5.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
DHANESWAR SAHU3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹10.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S L.N. CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNIHAR RANJAN awardedOthers

About NIHAR RANJAN PATEL

NIHAR RANJAN PATEL appears as a bidder on 70 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 63 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 17.5% win rate — worth ₹57.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 54.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against tapan kumar sahu, JISHU KRISHNA PATRA and SANJIT KUMAR NAIK. tapan kumar sahu bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; NIHAR RANJAN PATEL won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.