Competitor profile

NETCOM MARKETING SERVICES

They win 29% of what they bid, but only 9% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

38tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
38
38 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.6 L
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 8.9% conversion
Win rate
28.9%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count38 bids
28.9%
71.1%
Awarded1128.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2771.1%
By value₹2.7 Cr
91.1%
Awarded₹23.6 L8.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.4 Cr91.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹23.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹23.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
a dot computers13 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
BLUEBLAZE SYSTEMS AND SERVICES PVT LTD6 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹22.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Xybo3 IT Solution1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
04
BRAINNET Solutions3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5.0 L
won head-to-head
05
C.A.K. SOUND2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹98,087
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNETCOM MARKETING awardedOthers

About NETCOM MARKETING SERVICES

NETCOM MARKETING SERVICES appears as a bidder on 38 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 28.9% win rate — worth ₹23.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against a dot computers, BLUEBLAZE SYSTEMS AND SERVICES PVT LTD and Xybo3 IT Solution. a dot computers bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 13 of them; NETCOM MARKETING SERVICES won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.