Competitor profile

NEOFAM INSTRUMENTS

They win 38% of what they bid, but only 24% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
15 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
8
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.3 L
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 24.3% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
25.0%
37.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected225.0%
Lost337.5%
By value₹1.6 Cr
24.3%
67.5%
Awarded₹38.3 L24.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr67.5%
Lost₹13.0 L8.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹38.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Biotech3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹17.3 L
won head-to-head
02
INDO SCIENTIFIC AND SURGICALS PVT. LTD.2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹46.0 L
won head-to-head
03
YASHICA INC1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹24.2 L
won head-to-head
04
S.M. SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS PVT. LTD.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹90,000
won head-to-head
05
MEDISPHERE BIOTECH INDIA PVT. LTD.2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹50.1 L
won head-to-head
06
₹3.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNEOFAM INSTRUMENTS awardedOthers

About NEOFAM INSTRUMENTS

NEOFAM INSTRUMENTS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹38.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director of Health Services, at 56.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Biotech, INDO SCIENTIFIC AND SURGICALS PVT. LTD. and YASHICA INC. M/S Biotech bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; NEOFAM INSTRUMENTS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.