Competitor profile

Neeraj Sharma

They win 33% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
2 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹6.9 Cr bid — 29.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹6.9 Cr
29.1%
65.8%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr29.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 Cr65.8%
Lost₹35.0 L5.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JAY KAILADEVI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
HANSOLA ENGINEERING COMPANY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹27.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Ravi Kumar Sharma0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M K DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BABA BARFANI JI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNeeraj Sharma awardedOthers

About Neeraj Sharma

Neeraj Sharma appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Industrial Development Corporation Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JAY KAILADEVI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, HANSOLA ENGINEERING COMPANY and Ravi Kumar Sharma. JAY KAILADEVI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Neeraj Sharma won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.