Competitor profile

nazir Ahmad Dar and sons

They win 22% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
3 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
32
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹5.8 Cr bid — 19.4% conversion
Win rate
21.9%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
21.9%
78.1%
Awarded721.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2578.1%
By value₹5.8 Cr
19.4%
80.6%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr19.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.7 Cr80.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S ABBAS M. ENTERPRISES6 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹77.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Gh Qadir and Sons3 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹33.1 L
won head-to-head
03
MS Ghulam Hassan and Sons3 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹56.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S BASHIR AHMAD AND SONS0 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S GEE EMM MIR4 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹35.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S ABDUL RASHID AND CO0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardednazir Ahmad awardedOthers

About nazir Ahmad Dar and sons

nazir Ahmad Dar and sons appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 21.9% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 15.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S ABBAS M. ENTERPRISES, M/s Gh Qadir and Sons and MS Ghulam Hassan and Sons. M/S ABBAS M. ENTERPRISES bid on 32 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; nazir Ahmad Dar and sons won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.