Competitor profile

NAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 15% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

26tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
26
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹9.8 Cr bid — 13.3% conversion
Win rate
15.4%
of 26 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count26 bids
15.4%
84.6%
Awarded415.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2284.6%
By value₹9.8 Cr
13.3%
86.7%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr13.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹8.5 Cr86.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Siddique constructions2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹40.7 L
won head-to-head
02
AMAR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s.Santosh Kotarki0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SAYED MUSTAQ AHMED2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹59.8 L
won head-to-head
05
RAMESH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹37.4 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s D.Krishna Varma3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About NAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS

NAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 26 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 15.4% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Siddique constructions, AMAR CONSTRUCTION and M/s.Santosh Kotarki. Siddique constructions bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.