Competitor profile

M/S NAYAL ELECTRICALS

They win 22% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹9.8 Cr bid — 21.8% conversion
Win rate
21.6%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
21.6%
70.3%
Awarded821.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected38.1%
Lost2670.3%
By value₹9.8 Cr
21.8%
68.5%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr21.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹95.3 L9.7%
Lost₹6.7 Cr68.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

8 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s RK JOSHI&SONS3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹55.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S BHATT ENTERPRISES5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹75.2 L
won head-to-head
03
aditya construction1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
04
SS Construction Co0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KUMAON VALLEY CONSTRUCTION1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹8.3 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S S R Construction1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹27.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAYAL ELECTRICALS awardedOthers

About M/S NAYAL ELECTRICALS

M/S NAYAL ELECTRICALS appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 21.6% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s RK JOSHI&SONS, M/S BHATT ENTERPRISES and aditya construction. M/s RK JOSHI&SONS bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S NAYAL ELECTRICALS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.