Competitor profile

M/S NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS PROF ISHFAQ AHMED NAYAK

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0.2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12,179
of ₹71.8 L bid — 0.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹71.8 L
99.8%
Awarded₹12,1790.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹71.7 L99.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABDUL QAYOOM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MHM CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SH SAJAD AHMEWD WANI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SH MANZOOR AHMED WANI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹67.4 L
won head-to-head
05
Mohammad Yousuf Shah0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About M/S NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS PROF ISHFAQ AHMED NAYAK

M/S NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS PROF ISHFAQ AHMED NAYAK appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹12,179 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABDUL QAYOOM, MHM CONSTRUCTIONS and SH SAJAD AHMEWD WANI. ABDUL QAYOOM bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; M/S NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS PROF ISHFAQ AHMED NAYAK won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.