Competitor profile

NAYAB ENTERPRISES

They win 24% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

17tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.3 L
of ₹99.4 L bid — 10.3% conversion
Win rate
23.5%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
23.5%
70.6%
Awarded423.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1270.6%
By value₹99.4 L
10.3%
38.1%
51.6%
Awarded₹10.3 L10.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹37.8 L38.1%
Lost₹51.3 L51.6%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A M TRADERS1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
02
MUNAVVAR SCRAP1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
03
SHUBHAM ROCK DRILL0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ABABEEL BROTHERS5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹65.3 L
won head-to-head
05
NATIONAL TRADERS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
OM INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROJECTS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAYAB ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About NAYAB ENTERPRISES

NAYAB ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 23.5% win rate — worth ₹10.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 49.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against A M TRADERS, MUNAVVAR SCRAP and SHUBHAM ROCK DRILL. A M TRADERS bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NAYAB ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.