Competitor profile

M/s Natraj Const. Co.

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

221tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
24 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
220
221 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
31
188 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.4 Cr
of ₹53.8 Cr bid — 6.3% conversion
Win rate
14.1%
of 220 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count220 bids
14.1%
85.5%
Awarded3114.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected10.5%
Lost18885.5%
By value₹53.8 Cr
93.1%
Awarded₹3.4 Cr6.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹29.0 L0.5%
Lost₹50.1 Cr93.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

31 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHOBI BUILDERS15 wins · 59 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Prem Prakash Gupta & Co.8 wins · 57 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s N.K. Const. Co.14 wins · 50 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s U.K.Traders5 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹58.6 L
won head-to-head
05
RAKESH BANSAL1 win · 36 shared tenders
₹49.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Ashok Kumar Gupta2 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹25.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNatraj Const. awardedOthers

About M/s Natraj Const. Co.

M/s Natraj Const. Co. appears as a bidder on 221 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 220 decided bids, it was awarded 31 — a 14.1% win rate — worth ₹3.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Delhi, at 90.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 28.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHOBI BUILDERS, M/s Prem Prakash Gupta & Co. and M/s N.K. Const. Co.. SHOBI BUILDERS bid on 59 of the same tenders and won 15 of them; M/s Natraj Const. Co. won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.