Competitor profile

Narendra Kala

They win 29% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
6 May 2025last award
Total bids
7
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹3.6 Cr bid — 33.4% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
28.6%
28.6%
42.9%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost342.9%
By value₹3.6 Cr
33.4%
13.5%
53.0%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr33.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.8 L13.5%
Lost₹1.9 Cr53.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHREE BANKEY BIHARI UDYOG1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S Nagendra Datt Joshi0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS Gurvinder singh0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HARSH PATI SEMWAL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹21.8 L
won head-to-head
05
ASHISH PANWAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹15.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Rajpal Singh Bisht0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNarendra Kala awardedOthers

About Narendra Kala

Narendra Kala appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 May 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CGM (Drinking Water) Jal Sansthan, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHREE BANKEY BIHARI UDYOG, M/S Nagendra Datt Joshi and MS Gurvinder singh. SHREE BANKEY BIHARI UDYOG bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Narendra Kala won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.