Competitor profile

NANU CONSTRUCTION

They win 9% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
11
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.5 L
of ₹5.5 Cr bid — 1.7% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
45.5%
45.5%
Awarded19.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected545.5%
Lost545.5%
By value₹5.5 Cr
53.3%
45.0%
Awarded₹9.5 L1.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.0 Cr53.3%
Lost₹2.5 Cr45.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹9.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S.PATIL ENTERPRISES1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹55.4 L
won head-to-head
02
RAJESH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Micro Leakage Care2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Micro Leakage Care Private Limited1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹42.4 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Binny Associate0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAMA TECHNOLOGY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNANU CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NANU CONSTRUCTION

About NANU CONSTRUCTION

NANU CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹9.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S.PATIL ENTERPRISES, RAJESH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD and Micro Leakage Care. M/S.PATIL ENTERPRISES bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NANU CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.