Competitor profile

NANO TECHNOLOGY

They win 26% of what they bid, and 27% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
13 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.9 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 26.9% conversion
Win rate
26.3%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
26.3%
36.8%
36.8%
Awarded526.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected736.8%
Lost736.8%
By value₹3.0 Cr
26.9%
39.8%
33.3%
Awarded₹79.9 L26.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.2 Cr39.8%
Lost₹98.8 L33.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MD- UJVN₹75.4 L94.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹79.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
United Engineers1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
02
LIV TECHNOLOGY4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹25.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Singhal and Co0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MITTAL ENTERPRISES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹24.5 L
won head-to-head
05
Bhartiya Elecmech Corporation0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KOTHARI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNANO TECHNOLOGY awardedOthers

About NANO TECHNOLOGY

NANO TECHNOLOGY appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 26.3% win rate — worth ₹79.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD- UJVN, at 94.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against United Engineers, LIV TECHNOLOGY and M/s Singhal and Co. United Engineers bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NANO TECHNOLOGY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.