Competitor profile

M/s Nandani Construction

They win 29% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

59tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
29 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
59
59 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.9 Cr
of ₹102.9 Cr bid — 37.8% conversion
Win rate
28.8%
of 59 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count59 bids
28.8%
45.8%
25.4%
Awarded1728.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2745.8%
Lost1525.4%
By value₹102.9 Cr
37.8%
35.8%
26.4%
Awarded₹38.9 Cr37.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹36.8 Cr35.8%
Lost₹27.2 Cr26.4%

Where they win

6 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

IRD - Chief Engineer₹11.4 Cr29.3%
MD- UJVN₹1.9 Cr4.9%
MD - UPCL₹1.4 Cr3.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹38.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Suresh Kumar Jain0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Kunwar Construction1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
DEV ENTERPRISES3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Pratap Singh Pundir0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KULDEEP SINGH NEGI0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNandani Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Nandani Construction

M/s Nandani Construction appears as a bidder on 59 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 59 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 28.8% win rate — worth ₹38.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 48.9% of what it has won, out of 6 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Suresh Kumar Jain, Kunwar Construction and DEV ENTERPRISES. M/s Suresh Kumar Jain bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Nandani Construction won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.