Competitor profile

M/S NANDA CONSTRUCTION

They win 11% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

46tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
46
46 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
40 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹18.3 Cr bid — 9.1% conversion
Win rate
10.9%
of 46 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count46 bids
10.9%
87.0%
Awarded510.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.2%
Lost4087.0%
By value₹18.3 Cr
88.5%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr9.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹44.3 L2.4%
Lost₹16.2 Cr88.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PAPPU ROY CONSTRUCTION9 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RC GUPTA AND SONS6 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s KUMAR ENTERPRISES7 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S JAI AMBAY CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S MODERN CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S Harsh Traders0 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNANDA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S NANDA CONSTRUCTION

M/S NANDA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 46 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 46 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 10.9% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PAPPU ROY CONSTRUCTION, RC GUPTA AND SONS and M/s KUMAR ENTERPRISES. PAPPU ROY CONSTRUCTION bid on 40 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; M/S NANDA CONSTRUCTION won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.