Competitor profile

Namdev Kater And Chat Centre

They win 20% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

5tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹888
of ₹1,828 bid — 48.6% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
20.0%
40.0%
40.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹1,828
48.6%
48.6%
Awarded₹88848.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹522.9%
Lost₹88848.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹888

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shree Ram Namkeen Bhandar1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹130
won head-to-head
02
M.M.B. Sweets1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹592
won head-to-head
03
Agarwal Foods1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹31
won head-to-head
04
NAWAL KISHOR CHORSIYA CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S MAN SINGH CHOUHAN1 win · 1 shared tender
₹280
won head-to-head
06
Shri Ram Pratap Harsora and Sons0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNamdev Kater awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Namdev Kater

About Namdev Kater And Chat Centre

Namdev Kater And Chat Centre appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹888 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Agriculture Deptt - Commissioner, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 50.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Shree Ram Namkeen Bhandar, M.M.B. Sweets and Agarwal Foods. Shree Ram Namkeen Bhandar bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Namdev Kater And Chat Centre won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.