Competitor profile

NAKODA PARSHAWNATH SUPPLIERS

They win 86% of what they bid, and 86% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Apr 2021last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6
of ₹7 bid — 85.7% conversion
Win rate
85.7%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
85.7%
14.3%
Awarded685.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost114.3%
By value₹7
85.7%
14.3%
Awarded₹685.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹114.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Gulam Sadik S/o Gulam Rasul0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PRINCE TRADERS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
03
M/s Qadri Traders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MEWAR TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VINAYAK TRADING COMPANY2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
06
JILANI TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAKODA PARSHAWNATH awardedOthers

About NAKODA PARSHAWNATH SUPPLIERS

NAKODA PARSHAWNATH SUPPLIERS appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 85.7% win rate — worth ₹6 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Apr 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Prisons, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Gulam Sadik S/o Gulam Rasul, PRINCE TRADERS and M/s Qadri Traders. Gulam Sadik S/o Gulam Rasul bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NAKODA PARSHAWNATH SUPPLIERS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.