Competitor profile

NAGEN MISTRY

They win 67% of what they bid — and 99.8% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
4 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 L
of ₹2.8 L bid — 99.8% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost133.3%
By value₹2.8 L
99.8%
Awarded₹2.8 L99.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6670.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A VENKATASAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
S.P. MANMADA RAO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
K VEERARAJ0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Nirupama Enterprise and Services0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SEPHALI BHAKTA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DAS TRANSPORT AND SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAGEN MISTRY awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NAGEN MISTRY

About NAGEN MISTRY

NAGEN MISTRY appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹2.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DIRECTORATE OF RD PRIS and ULBS, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Andaman And Nicobar. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against A VENKATASAN, S.P. MANMADA RAO and K VEERARAJ. A VENKATASAN bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NAGEN MISTRY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.