Competitor profile

M/S N A Enterprises

They win 11% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

41tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
41 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹29.2 L
of ₹5.8 Cr bid — 5.1% conversion
Win rate
10.8%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
10.8%
83.8%
Awarded410.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected25.4%
Lost3183.8%
By value₹5.8 Cr
92.7%
Awarded₹29.2 L5.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹13.0 L2.3%
Lost₹5.3 Cr92.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹15.5 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S B A Traders1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
03
JK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹29.1 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Noor Mohammad Shalla0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
rafiq trading co0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RATHER STEEL WORKS2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹10.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedN A Enterprises awardedOthers

About M/S N A Enterprises

M/S N A Enterprises appears as a bidder on 41 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 10.8% win rate — worth ₹29.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 30.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR, M/S B A Traders and JK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS. M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S N A Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.