Competitor profile

M/S N.A. AND SONS

They win 38% of what they bid, but only 13% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
18 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
16
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹82.8 L
of ₹6.5 Cr bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
37.5%
12.5%
50.0%
Awarded637.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected212.5%
Lost850.0%
By value₹6.5 Cr
12.8%
85.3%
Awarded₹82.8 L12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.7 L1.8%
Lost₹5.5 Cr85.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

DG,CRPF,MHA₹82.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MEHJOOR CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹72.7 L
won head-to-head
02
Basharat Rafiq Darzi1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S KUCHAY BROTHERS2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹33.1 L
won head-to-head
04
ABDUL RASHID DAGA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
05
MIRAJ KHAN & COMPANY1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹85.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Mehraj Ud Din Rather1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedN.A. AND SONS awardedOthers

About M/S N.A. AND SONS

M/S N.A. AND SONS appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹82.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DG,CRPF,MHA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MEHJOOR CONSTRUCTION, Basharat Rafiq Darzi and M/S KUCHAY BROTHERS. MEHJOOR CONSTRUCTION bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S N.A. AND SONS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.