Competitor profile

MUTE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

They win 33% of what they bid — and 47% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹49.3 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 46.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.1 Cr
46.6%
53.4%
Awarded₹49.3 L46.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹56.4 L53.4%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CATHEXIS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Sharad Advertising Pvt. Ltd.,0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Q-MAX SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
EMINENCE GROUP OF ENTERTAINMENT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
CAMPAIGN SCOUTS (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹36.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUTE ENTERTAINMENT awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUTE ENTERTAINMENT

About MUTE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

MUTE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹49.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Rourkela, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against CATHEXIS, Sharad Advertising Pvt. Ltd., and Q-MAX SERVICES. CATHEXIS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MUTE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.