Competitor profile

MUSHTAQ AHMAD NAIKOO

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 16% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.0 L
of ₹70.6 L bid — 15.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹70.6 L
15.6%
75.6%
Awarded₹11.0 L15.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.2 L8.8%
Lost₹53.3 L75.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HADI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S ADIL HUSSAIN ITOO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAVAID AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TOUSEEF AHMAD NATH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TAWKEER AHMAD DASS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BABY IRSHADIA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUSHTAQ AHMAD awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUSHTAQ AHMAD

About MUSHTAQ AHMAD NAIKOO

MUSHTAQ AHMAD NAIKOO appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹11.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Floriculture Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HADI ENTERPRISES, M/S ADIL HUSSAIN ITOO and JAVAID AHMAD BHAT. HADI ENTERPRISES bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MUSHTAQ AHMAD NAIKOO won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.