Competitor profile

MURALIDHAR SAMAL

They win 10% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.1 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 8.8% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
90.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost990.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
91.2%
Awarded₹16.1 L8.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.7 Cr91.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹16.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹16.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PUSPALATA SAHOO1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹16.9 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S NANDA KISHORE NATH0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
DILLIP KUMAR BEHERA0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BISHNU KUMAR DAS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹14.1 L
won head-to-head
05
TUSARKANTA PRADHAN1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
06
SHAKTI NATH0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMURALIDHAR awardedOthers

About MURALIDHAR SAMAL

MURALIDHAR SAMAL appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹16.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PUSPALATA SAHOO, M/S NANDA KISHORE NATH and DILLIP KUMAR BEHERA. PUSPALATA SAHOO bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MURALIDHAR SAMAL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.