Competitor profile

Mukul Kanti Chakma

They win 39% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
12 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.9 Cr
of ₹7.4 Cr bid — 39.3% conversion
Win rate
38.7%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count31 bids
38.7%
54.8%
Awarded1238.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected26.5%
Lost1754.8%
By value₹7.4 Cr
39.3%
55.6%
Awarded₹2.9 Cr39.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹38.4 L5.2%
Lost₹4.1 Cr55.6%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹2.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAMPA SARMA BANIK1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹5.8 L
won head-to-head
02
MATINDRA TRIPURA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹21.6 L
won head-to-head
03
BAKULDHAN TRIPURA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹30.6 L
won head-to-head
04
PRADIP JAMATIA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹6.1 L
won head-to-head
05
Suman Miah0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DHARMENDRA TRIPURA2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹40.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMukul Kanti awardedOthers

About Mukul Kanti Chakma

Mukul Kanti Chakma appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 38.7% win rate — worth ₹2.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 41.5% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAMPA SARMA BANIK, MATINDRA TRIPURA and BAKULDHAN TRIPURA. SAMPA SARMA BANIK bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Mukul Kanti Chakma won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.