Competitor profile

MUHAMMED SHAFI P.A.

They win 31% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
35
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹4.6 Cr bid — 29.6% conversion
Win rate
31.4%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
31.4%
25.7%
42.9%
Awarded1131.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected925.7%
Lost1542.9%
By value₹4.6 Cr
29.6%
38.3%
32.1%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr29.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr38.3%
Lost₹1.5 Cr32.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹80.9 L59.7%
PWD₹20.9 L15.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MUHAMMED ALI P.S.1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹3.5 L
won head-to-head
02
ABDUL JALEEL P S0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA P.1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹6.5 L
won head-to-head
04
VISHNUJITH.M0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MUHAMMED ABDURAHIMAN P V1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹7.5 L
won head-to-head
06
SANTHOSH K T2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED SHAFI awardedOthers

About MUHAMMED SHAFI P.A.

MUHAMMED SHAFI P.A. appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 31.4% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 59.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MUHAMMED ALI P.S., ABDUL JALEEL P S and MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA P.. MUHAMMED ALI P.S. bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MUHAMMED SHAFI P.A. won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.