Competitor profile

MUHAMMED SABIR GH

They win 69% of what they bid, and 78% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹44.0 L
of ₹56.2 L bid — 78.4% conversion
Win rate
69.2%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count13 bids
69.2%
23.1%
Awarded969.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.7%
Lost323.1%
By value₹56.2 L
78.4%
17.1%
Awarded₹44.0 L78.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 L4.5%
Lost₹9.6 L17.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹10.4 L23.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹44.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MOHAMMED SIYAB T M1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹3.8 L
won head-to-head
02
K ABDUL RAHIMAN1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
03
ABOOBACKER SIDDIK S U0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMMED ISMAIL C H0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
HUSSANKUNHI M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SOUDABI K0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED SABIR awardedOthers

About MUHAMMED SABIR GH

MUHAMMED SABIR GH appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 69.2% win rate — worth ₹44.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 76.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MOHAMMED SIYAB T M, K ABDUL RAHIMAN and ABOOBACKER SIDDIK S U. MOHAMMED SIYAB T M bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MUHAMMED SABIR GH won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.