Competitor profile

MUHAMMED NASIM

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 6% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 L
of ₹35.8 L bid — 6.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹35.8 L
91.0%
Awarded₹2.3 L6.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹32.6 L91.0%
Lost₹94,5322.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹2.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABDUL NAZER K P1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹92,528
won head-to-head
02
MALABAR LABOUR CONTRACT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
UMMER KUTTIKKADAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMMED SHIBIL PM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Latheef MA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹32.6 L
won head-to-head
06
Muhammed Shafi vemmully0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED NASIM awardedOthers

About MUHAMMED NASIM

MUHAMMED NASIM appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹2.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABDUL NAZER K P, MALABAR LABOUR CONTRACT and UMMER KUTTIKKADAN. ABDUL NAZER K P bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MUHAMMED NASIM won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.