Competitor profile

Muhammed kunju MA

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹26.6 L
of ₹94.4 L bid — 28.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
50.0%
12.5%
37.5%
Awarded450.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost337.5%
By value₹94.4 L
28.1%
63.3%
Awarded₹26.6 L28.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.1 L8.5%
Lost₹59.8 L63.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹26.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Jibin Jacob2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹13.4 L
won head-to-head
02
SUBASH KUMAR K V0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
jentyjoseph0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NASSAR K M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MUSLIYARUPARAMBIL EBRAHIM AHAMMED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KA SALAHUDHEEN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMuhammed kunju awardedOthers

About Muhammed kunju MA

Muhammed kunju MA appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹26.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Travancore Devaswom Board, at 67.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Jibin Jacob, SUBASH KUMAR K V and jentyjoseph. Jibin Jacob bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Muhammed kunju MA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.