Competitor profile

MUHAMMED HILAL CK

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
19 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.2 L
of ₹52.0 L bid — 19.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹52.0 L
19.5%
80.5%
Awarded₹10.2 L19.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹41.9 L80.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹10.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HASSAN ANEESH C M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MOHAMMED NIMSHAD K V0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ANOOP M S0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMMED SHIBIL PM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Mohammed Sayeed P M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MOHAMEDALI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED HILAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUHAMMED HILAL

About MUHAMMED HILAL CK

MUHAMMED HILAL CK appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹10.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HASSAN ANEESH C M, MOHAMMED NIMSHAD K V and ANOOP M S. HASSAN ANEESH C M bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MUHAMMED HILAL CK won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.