Competitor profile

MUHAMMED HANEEFA PY

They win 6% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Jan 2025last award
Total bids
18
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.7 L
of ₹6.3 Cr bid — 3.3% conversion
Win rate
5.6%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
94.4%
Awarded15.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1794.4%
By value₹6.3 Cr
96.7%
Awarded₹20.7 L3.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.1 Cr96.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
E K IBRAHIMKUTTY1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹6.8 L
won head-to-head
02
SIRAJUDHEEN P.P.6 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHOUKATHALI U0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Jayakumar V V0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BIDP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED HANEEFA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUHAMMED HANEEFA

About MUHAMMED HANEEFA PY

MUHAMMED HANEEFA PY appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 5.6% win rate — worth ₹20.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jan 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Calicut, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against E K IBRAHIMKUTTY, SIRAJUDHEEN P.P. and CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD. E K IBRAHIMKUTTY bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MUHAMMED HANEEFA PY won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.