Competitor profile

MUHAMMED FAYAS E

They win 25% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹5.1 Cr bid — 27.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
25.0%
41.7%
33.3%
Awarded325.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected541.7%
Lost433.3%
By value₹5.1 Cr
27.5%
64.2%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr27.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.3 Cr64.2%
Lost₹42.0 L8.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹83.5 L59.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAMRIDHI STRUCTURES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ANOOP R0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Joy.T1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹65.9 L
won head-to-head
04
DAVID RAJ2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹32.5 L
won head-to-head
05
SUNEER.A0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SPACEX INTERIO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED FAYAS awardedOthers

About MUHAMMED FAYAS E

MUHAMMED FAYAS E appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 59.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAMRIDHI STRUCTURES, ANOOP R and Joy.T. SAMRIDHI STRUCTURES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MUHAMMED FAYAS E won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.