Competitor profile

MUHAMMAD NOWFAL N A

They win 6% of what they bid, and 1% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
5 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 L
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 1.4% conversion
Win rate
5.9%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
88.2%
Awarded15.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1588.2%
By value₹3.1 Cr
98.1%
Awarded₹4.2 L1.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 L0.6%
Lost₹3.1 Cr98.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹4.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VIJOY KUMAR MONTHERO3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
02
ABDUL KHADER C A2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
03
ABDULLA A T0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHOUKATHALI K1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.6 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ahammed C H B1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMAD NOWFAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUHAMMAD NOWFAL

About MUHAMMAD NOWFAL N A

MUHAMMAD NOWFAL N A appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 5.9% win rate — worth ₹4.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VIJOY KUMAR MONTHERO, ABDUL KHADER C A and ABDULLA A T. VIJOY KUMAR MONTHERO bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; MUHAMMAD NOWFAL N A won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.