Competitor profile

MUHAMMAD HASSAN

They win 25% of what they bid — and 51% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
15 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.4 L
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 50.7% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected250.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹1.6 Cr
50.7%
40.3%
Awarded₹79.4 L50.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.0 L8.9%
Lost₹63.1 L40.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹79.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹79.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Farookh Baiju0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GREGORY.C2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹14.0 L
won head-to-head
04
ABDUL LATHIEF1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹58.2 L
won head-to-head
05
SAI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PT APPACHAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMAD HASSAN awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUHAMMAD HASSAN

About MUHAMMAD HASSAN

MUHAMMAD HASSAN appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹79.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ONESQ BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, Farookh Baiju and GREGORY.C. ONESQ BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MUHAMMAD HASSAN won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.