Competitor profile

MUHAMMAD AFSAL A

They win 20% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.4 L
of ₹24.5 L bid — 22.0% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
20.0%
60.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹24.5 L
22.0%
43.8%
34.2%
Awarded₹5.4 L22.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.7 L43.8%
Lost₹8.4 L34.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹5.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUBRAMANIAN K1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.4 L
won head-to-head
02
RITHU M.V0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SUNEERA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.6 L
won head-to-head
04
SUMOD A P0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANI K0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHAMSEER N1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMAD AFSAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MUHAMMAD AFSAL

About MUHAMMAD AFSAL A

MUHAMMAD AFSAL A appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹5.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUBRAMANIAN K, RITHU M.V and SUNEERA. SUBRAMANIAN K bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MUHAMMAD AFSAL A won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.