Competitor profile

MSN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

They win 30% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

63tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
28 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
63
63 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
19
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹5.7 Cr bid — 25.7% conversion
Win rate
30.2%
of 63 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count63 bids
30.2%
20.6%
49.2%
Awarded1930.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1320.6%
Lost3149.2%
By value₹5.7 Cr
25.7%
27.6%
46.7%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr25.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr27.6%
Lost₹2.6 Cr46.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KOTHARI ENTERPRISES4 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹52.8 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Singhal and Co8 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹66.0 L
won head-to-head
03
m/s star power solutions10 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹62.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Shiv Shakti Construction4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹24.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Ghasita Contractor0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S AJAY TOMAR CONTRACTOR1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMSN CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About MSN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

MSN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY appears as a bidder on 63 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 63 decided bids, it was awarded 19 — a 30.2% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Power Transmisison Corporation of Uttarakhand Limited), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KOTHARI ENTERPRISES, M/s Singhal and Co and m/s star power solutions. KOTHARI ENTERPRISES bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; MSN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.