Competitor profile

MS VINOD TRADERS

They win 13% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.2 L
of ₹3.3 Cr bid — 6.5% conversion
Win rate
13.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
13.3%
86.7%
Awarded213.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1386.7%
By value₹3.3 Cr
93.5%
Awarded₹21.2 L6.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.0 Cr93.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD- Roads and Bridges₹21.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
R N R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹55.4 L
won head-to-head
02
J R PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS PARASHU RAM PATEL PROP4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹44.8 L
won head-to-head
04
Neeraj Kumar Pateriya Contractor0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHUBHIKSHA CONSTRUCTIONS3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹31.8 L
won head-to-head
06
BUNDELA ASSOCIATE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS VINOD TRADERS awardedOthers

About MS VINOD TRADERS

MS VINOD TRADERS appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 13.3% win rate — worth ₹21.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD- Roads and Bridges, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against R N R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, J R PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. and MS PARASHU RAM PATEL PROP. R N R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MS VINOD TRADERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.