Competitor profile

Ms V. S. NAYAK

They win 11% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
4 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
44
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹15.3 Cr bid — 10.6% conversion
Win rate
11.4%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count44 bids
11.4%
86.4%
Awarded511.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.3%
Lost3886.4%
By value₹15.3 Cr
10.6%
84.0%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr10.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹82.8 L5.4%
Lost₹12.8 Cr84.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K.G.SHANKER5 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ABDUL RAHIM1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹25.6 L
won head-to-head
03
SIRI SALES AND SERVICES3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹67.7 L
won head-to-head
04
LEKSHMI ENGINEERS1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹33.4 L
won head-to-head
05
KVL CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹57.4 L
won head-to-head
06
ANKIT SHIP REPAIRERS AND SUPPLIERS2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹52.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMs V. S. awardedOthers

About Ms V. S. NAYAK

Ms V. S. NAYAK appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 11.4% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 18.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against K.G.SHANKER, ABDUL RAHIM and SIRI SALES AND SERVICES. K.G.SHANKER bid on 28 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; Ms V. S. NAYAK won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.