Competitor profile

MS Sudha Construction

They win 50% of what they bid — and 61% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 L
of ₹5.4 L bid — 60.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹5.4 L
60.5%
39.5%
Awarded₹3.3 L60.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.1 L39.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Rural Engineering Service₹3.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹3.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RD CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MAA ANNAPURNA CORPORATION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Z K ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
04
TULIKA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MS PANKAJ KUMAR DIXIT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NEERAJ CONSTRUCRION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS Sudha Construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS Sudha Construction

About MS Sudha Construction

MS Sudha Construction appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹3.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Engineering Service, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RD CONSTRUCTIONS, MAA ANNAPURNA CORPORATION and Z K ENTERPRISES. RD CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MS Sudha Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.