Competitor profile

Ms SHIV JI CONSTRUCTION

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 16% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
13 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.8 L
of ₹49.8 L bid — 15.7% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹49.8 L
15.7%
84.3%
Awarded₹7.8 L15.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹41.9 L84.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATNESH MISHRA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹12.9 L
won head-to-head
02
ANAND SHARMA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7,330
won head-to-head
03
Kamakhya Infrastructure0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KGN TRADERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹23.9 L
won head-to-head
05
JYOTI BUILDCON TRADING0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMs SHIV JI awardedOthers

About Ms SHIV JI CONSTRUCTION

Ms SHIV JI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹7.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATNESH MISHRA, ANAND SHARMA and Kamakhya Infrastructure. RATNESH MISHRA bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Ms SHIV JI CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.