Competitor profile

MS OM CONSTRUCTION

They win 29% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
7
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹30.7 Cr
of ₹62.7 Cr bid — 49.0% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
28.6%
42.9%
28.6%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected342.9%
Lost228.6%
By value₹62.7 Cr
49.0%
29.8%
21.2%
Awarded₹30.7 Cr49.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.7 Cr29.8%
Lost₹13.3 Cr21.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LAXMI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
BAIBHAW CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s. UPENDRA YADAV0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ALOK KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SANTOSHI SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ALAM ENTERPRISE & BROTHERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS OM CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS OM CONSTRUCTION

About MS OM CONSTRUCTION

MS OM CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹30.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Works Department - Bihar, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against LAXMI CONSTRUCTION, BAIBHAW CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. and M/s. UPENDRA YADAV. LAXMI CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MS OM CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.