Competitor profile

MS NANUA CONSTRUCTION

They win 50% of what they bid — and 68% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.2 L
of ₹27.0 L bid — 67.6% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹27.0 L
67.6%
32.4%
Awarded₹18.2 L67.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹8.7 L32.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Narendra Kumar Sharm0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
BUNDELA ASSOCIATE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.8 L
won head-to-head
03
Jatasankar Construction Company0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ANIKET CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ACE CONSTRCUTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Jatashankar Bore Well0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS NANUA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS NANUA CONSTRUCTION

About MS NANUA CONSTRUCTION

MS NANUA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹18.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Health Engineering- O/o Engineer In Chief, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Narendra Kumar Sharm, BUNDELA ASSOCIATE and Jatasankar Construction Company. Narendra Kumar Sharm bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS NANUA CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.