Competitor profile

Ms KGL Infrastructures

They win 39% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
22 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.1 Cr
of ₹68.7 Cr bid — 45.3% conversion
Win rate
38.9%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
38.9%
11.1%
50.0%
Awarded738.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.1%
Lost950.0%
By value₹68.7 Cr
45.3%
48.7%
Awarded₹31.1 Cr45.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.1 Cr6.0%
Lost₹33.4 Cr48.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹28.5 Cr91.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹31.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Bisht Construction0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/s Shidhi Vinayak Construction0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHAN CHANDRA BHATT0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S GHANSHYAM TEWARI1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Harish Singh Shahi1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/s Manu Dev Contractor0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMs KGL Infrastructures awardedOthers

About Ms KGL Infrastructures

Ms KGL Infrastructures appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 38.9% win rate — worth ₹31.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 91.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Bisht Construction, M/s Shidhi Vinayak Construction and MOHAN CHANDRA BHATT. Bisht Construction bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Ms KGL Infrastructures won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.